erialCTable 1. Three analysis reports using Deaf and deaf participantsillustrating exam management of knowledgeable consent issuesCase study Goal of study Participants1 De Andrade To discover examination Deaf parents of Deafexperiences of little ones werecaregivers of deaf interviewedchildren in a ruralcontext2 Penn, et To describe exam Two scientific groupsal. linguistic and were studied: threecognitive profiles male learningof five deaf adults disabled deaf adultwith a sign signers and two male language disease deaf adult signerswith received right hemisphere damageas a results of astroke; theirperformance wascompared with thatof five male deafcontrols matchedfor age, degree ofdeafness andsigning dialect3 Janse van To document Five deaf adultVuuren classifiers in sign signers inlanguage narratives Johannesburg,SACase study Adaptations for Data managementdeafness1 De Andrade Two third parties used exam data includingto gain knowledgeable exam system ofconsent: a Deaf informed consentteacher assistant were videorecordedwith a longstanding and laterhistory of engagement transcribed by awith exam Deaf Deaf sign languagecommunity during this user who is adistrict, and a lecturer in SASLhearing person witha variety of deafand Deaf familymembers, fluent inexamination neighborhood SASLdialect2 Penn, et exam test battery was examination process ofal. translated into knowledgeable consenttwo sign dialects and allin SA and protected contributors’just one handed responses onsigns to manage examination test batteryfor exam presence were videoof hemiplegia. recorded andAll test later scored andinstructions were analysed by twogiven in sign adult deaflanguage. All examination signers and thetests were piloted researchers,on three deaf with highpersons prior to levels ofexamination study.